Is there a history of complaints for violating the right to access to the educational system? Hi there have been cases on s'hagi sanctions and fines per això?
I have always felt that post-compulsory studies are not significant fans of ACI, they are just fans of accés (donating more time, providing materials…) but in addition to the requirement to demonstrate to the student the skills required in the curriculum”
Resposta:
If you have escorted the next paper to the meva, we will escort that there are many incompliments throughout the long and extensive of our educational system, say the point that the European Community has issued a report on the systemic incompliments of our State in this matter. Per tant, denúncies deu haver hagut moltes perquè s'arribi aquesta conclusion.
Regarding the second question, I am going to comment that in the cap lloc of our legislation it was stated that the post-compulsory period is not puguin during a term of adaptation or accessibility measures. Of fet, these measures are d'accés, that is to say, not significant.
It is certain that it is not possible to “downgrade” curriculars to these levels, except in certain areas (own and foreign languages or physical education); but for the DEAs, both access and accessibility measures are sufficient (to be able to understand the donated texts and to be able to create written texts in equal conditions that the rest is the one that is demanded and is the one that is cal).
I hope I have solved the question; I remain at your disposal for any type of clarification. If all of us formem, we will make sure that the day of others people with dyslexia (and other disorders) keep the path one more planer. I received a greeting and all my thanks for your interest.
“How is it understood that in Catalonia the basic skills tests for primary and secondary schools are only allowed to dyslexic students and/or with ADHD who have 15 more minutes to take them?
Why are PAUs only given 15' plus extras and a discount on spelling?
Answer:
Giving a little more time and modulating the evaluation are adaptations of it, that is, of the evaluation, not accessibility criteria. Accessibility has to do with the barriers posed by written expression and reading. Making study and evaluation instruments accessible means changing them so that the student understands them on equal terms with others and so that he can express his knowledge in all its breadth. In other words, giving more time is a methodological or evaluation adaptation, not an incorporation of reasonable accessibility adjustments.
Therefore, reasonable accessibility adjustments are required from the administration apart from these two small measures.
I hope I have solved the question; I remain at your entire disposal for any clarification. If we all educate ourselves, we will ensure that tomorrow people with dyslexia (and other disorders) have a slightly smoother path. Receive a greeting and my greatest thanks for your interest.
“Given the current situation, do you recommend that students with AED have 'the card' recognizing their disability? It should not be mandatory, but if not, we are in a defenseless situation”
Answer:
As things stand, really, it is preferable to have it, although only for dyslexia in no autonomous community do they give more than 33% (which is what gives you the opportunity to have the "license"). If the problem is combined with others, each of them adds up and that percentage can be reached.
However, as I explained, it is not necessary to have said "card" in order to guarantee the rights of people with disabilities. Nowhere in educational legislation is it established that a certain percentage must be obtained in order to have each of the rights associated with people with disabilities. Only the need for more than 33% to reserve seats, for free fees at post-compulsory levels and little else is expressly referred to.
In summary, if more disorders or diseases can be added that give rise to the recognition of more than 33%, I absolutely recommend it, but if not, we have the same educational rights as those who have that percentage because the regulations do not limit it. , but only refer to “disability”. This is so even though most members of the educational community erroneously maintain the opposite. It is a false interpretation of the regulations (or, better, an interpretation that is already out of date with the current legislation) that we have to ensure is changed based on training and information.
I hope I have solved the question; I remain at your entire disposal for any clarification. If we all educate ourselves, we will ensure that tomorrow people with dyslexia (and other disorders) have a slightly smoother path. Receive a greeting and my greatest thanks for your interest.
"If I denounce lack of accessibility, who does it affect, the teacher or the school?"
Answer:
It actually affects everyone. What should be done is a solidarity complaint to the following:
- The teacher or counselor who has not implemented the accessibility resources (having requested them);
- To the director of the center, as responsible for everything that happens in the institution;
- If it is public, to the Ministry of Education of the Autonomous Community;
- If it is private, to the ownership of the center as subsidiary civil liability.
In any case, before denouncing, you must have proof of everything that has been done or not done. To do this, my advice is that everything that is requested be in writing with an entry record, because the words are carried away by the wind and, normally, the teachers or counselors are not going to want to go as our witnesses if they later have to continue in the center. We will be able to taste what we have ordered. What we cannot prove is what they have not done (it is impossible to prove negative facts). In any case, it is the center that must prove what it has done.
For all this, legal advice is needed from a professional specifically dedicated to these issues, which are not an easy field. You have to find someone specialized.
I hope I have solved the question; I remain at your entire disposal for any clarification. If we all educate ourselves, we will ensure that tomorrow people with dyslexia (and other disorders) have a slightly smoother path. Receive a greeting and my greatest thanks for your interest.
“Is it the autonomous community that decides whether or not there can be adaptations in the PAAU for students who have a diagnosis or reports of learning disorders? We understand that in Catalonia this depends on the central government. What is the regulation that includes it?
Answer:
These tests are organized by the interuniversity council of each autonomous community, which does not mean that national and international regulations can be skipped. In other words, there are some general rules that regulate it and others in the community that develop it. The latter must submit to the former.
La international regulations that regulates it in Spain is essentially:
- International convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (art. 24)
La state regulations on the individual is primarily:
- Royal Legislative Decree 1/2013, of November 29, approving the Consolidated Text of the General Law on the rights of people with disabilities and their social inclusion (arts. 7, 18, 20)
- Organic Law 2/2006, of May 3, on Education (arts. 1 and 38), modified by Organic Law 8/2013, of December 9, on improving educational quality (LOMCE)
- Organic Law 6/2001, of December 21, on Universities, (DA 24)
La Catalan regulations on accessibility in university entrance exams can be found at:
- Catalan Law 13/2014, of May 30, on accessibility (arts. 21 and 32)
- Catalan Law 1/2003, of February 19, on Universities of Catalonia (art. 4).
I hope I have solved the question; I remain at your entire disposal for any clarification. If we all educate ourselves, we will ensure that tomorrow people with dyslexia (and other disorders) have a slightly smoother path. Receive a greeting and my greatest thanks for your interest.
“In your opinion, given the still 'defenseless' situation of students with dyslexia, would you recommend having the 'disability card?'
Answer:
As things stand, really, it is preferable to have it, although only for dyslexia in no autonomous community do they give more than 33% (which is what gives you the opportunity to have the "license"). If the problem is combined with others, each of them adds up and that percentage can be reached.
However, as I explained, it is not necessary to have said "card" in order to guarantee the rights of people with disabilities. Nowhere in educational legislation is it established that a certain percentage must be obtained in order to have each of the rights associated with people with disabilities. Only the need for more than 33% to reserve seats, for free fees at post-compulsory levels and little else is expressly referred to.
In summary, if more disorders or diseases can be added that give rise to the recognition of more than 33%, I absolutely recommend it, but if not, we have the same educational rights as those who have that percentage because the regulations do not limit it. , but only refer to “disability”. This is so even though most members of the educational community erroneously maintain the opposite. It is a false interpretation of the regulations (or, better, an interpretation that is already out of date with the current legislation) that we have to ensure is changed based on training and information.
I hope I have solved the question; I remain at your entire disposal for any clarification. If we all educate ourselves, we will ensure that tomorrow people with dyslexia (and other disorders) have a slightly smoother path. Receive a greeting and my greatest thanks for your interest.
Mrs. Satorras' email: satorras@ub.edu
Presentation Rosa Satorras